Quote:
"I want equal rights for everyone who is aged 13+ with no or (perhaps) little exceptions".
Duke, If by 'rights' you mean freedom to drive on the public highway, drink alcohol in a pub, vote, marry, have sex, raise children, join the armed forces, stand for election to parliament, and all the other things that are the preserve of adults, I think you may have to wait a while for this particular proposal to hit the statute books.
Young people in the age range around 13-16 are not treated legally as adults because they are in that transitional stage of life between being children and being adults. Individuals mature at different points in their development. There are plenty of people who, despite being over 18 and therefore officially adults, behave like children. Conversely there are people who develop earlier than average for whom the constraints of being a teenager might be difficult to accept.
Given such a spread of developmental speed, the government has chosen 18 as the nominal point at which adulthood is achieved. Of course, being government (and never managing to get things quite right), it then goes on to fog the issue by determining that the age limit for some activities is fixed at a different age.
It's a bit of a mess, but whatever the position it's going to be a compromise. Personally I think setting the age of attaining 'adulthood' at 18 is about right.
One of the reasons why I don't think you will ever see the age of majority being moved as far as 13 is all about brain development. The area of the brain that evaluates and assesses risk does not develop until late in the teen years. In those circumstances it would simply be inappropriate to expect youngsters to make adult decisions.
Earlier in the thread a few posters suggested something along the lines that you will look at things very differently in a few years time. As I recall you gave them both barrels in your response ;-)
I won't be so presumptuous as to tell you how you might feel now or in the future, but I will say how
I found things. Like one of the earlier posters, I had no fear in my teens. That was simply down to brain development or, more specifically, its frontal lobes. As a result of that, some activities (had they been legal) would have been dangerous both for me and for those around me. I thought I knew everything, but time has proved that I didn't. I did and said some things as a teenager of which I am truly ashamed today. I was a complete idiot. That's how it was for me.
I take your point that being a teenager today must be very different to what it was in the past. In my time and social group, teenagers were definitely children until they attained the age of around 15. There were no ifs and buts. We were kids. Nowadays I accept that attitudes have shifted a long way. To be honest I wouldn't want to be a teenager in today's society. It was much easier being a teenager in the 50s.
Mike