Posted by Svengali on Monday, 19 February 2007 14:17:17

because some of us bored of the same subject being harped on over and over and over again..

Posted by rennie on Monday, 19 February 2007 14:21:02

Yes I noticed this too. They did indeed delete an article on 9/11. The admins on this website are blatant gostapos.

Dave instead of censuring us, answer the question properly and actually do some research into 9/11.

Posted by WHYOHWHY on Monday, 19 February 2007 14:27:35

Mr. Cameron has moved the goalposts, now it's the top 3 blogs that get "answered" not 5.

911 is a crime so huge I almost feel like putting my head in the sand like Mr. Cameron.

Posted by Svengali on Monday, 19 February 2007 14:31:05

it wasnt actually a question either, isnt the idea supposed to be for us to pose questions to DC re policy rather than just posting articles pointing to the 'evil moderators' on the grassy knoll ? On a side note, hes given you his answers on 911 and what he believes , i'm not sure what else you expect him to do ? If and when he does come to power in 2009 both adminsitrations that were involved in this alledged conspiracy will have left power.

Posted by spivver on Monday, 19 February 2007 14:43:47

Svengali states "If and when he does come to power in 2009 both adminsitrations that were involved in this alledged conspiracy will have left power."

Yes, that may be the case, but that does not mean that the full forces of International Law cannot charge and prosecute the real perpetrators, does it, one day when the full truth surfaces??

Posted by flamesong on Monday, 19 February 2007 14:44:33

Yes, I noticed it when I came back to look at my question which was number one. When I voted for the BBC vs 911 question it knocked my question off the number one slot - not forgetable.

Perhaps Mr. Cameron's inability to answer any of the previous 9/11 questions satisfactorily has something to do with it. It seems to me that he just ducks and hopes the issue will go away.

And anybody who needs to hire thugs, whether they be suited bouncers or geeky webmasters, to shield them from awkwardness is unworthy of public office.

Posted by Svengali on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:01:21

"Perhaps Mr. Cameron's inability to answer any of the previous 9/11 questions satisfactorily has something to do with it. It seems to me that he just ducks and hopes the issue will go away."

In a sentence, whats the question ? what do you want him to answer ?

Posted by flamesong on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:22:50

In a sentence, I didn't ask the question which was posted today.

However, I do remember that it was related to the BBC documentary which was shown last night.

I think that if he gave any answer to a 9/11 related question which illustrated that he had actually considered the evidence put before him it would go some way to satisfying the persitent questions. Evidently he does not do so and his responses are glib and aloof.

Posted by Tizzy on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:37:34

Presumably, the author of the deleted post will have had a message from the site team, giving their reasons. Perhaps said author might care to share this message and stop yet more speculation.

Posted by Svengali on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:41:09

I think thats the problem. the only way the conspiracy theriosts will be satisfied is for DC to say that he agrees with you all and thats not going to happen.. hes stated he's happy with the American 911 findings, you want a 20 mins point by point presentation to show why ?? even if he was PM all he couldnt force another one. The only thing he could do as PM is pull the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan if there was incontrvertable proof that it was all one big pre-planned cover up.. Bush would never be tried, The Americans will never ever give over a former president to any kind of war tribunal and nobody has the power to make them.. fact.

Posted by Stjimmy on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:53:20

No he doesnt need to agree, he needs to realise that there are questions that need answered and for the 67 british dead because of that day.

People dont need to agree with Conspiracy Therorists but to say that the 9/11 commission did a good job and hasnt left any unanswered questions, is 100% false.

Therefore for the people with questions who's families died that day, deserve answers. Its that simple.

DC always side steps the issue and has probably never even taken the 9/11 questions seriously.

Posted by spiepie on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:54:38

why do you not want to talk about this?

what Is your view on the fact that the BBC had 2 versions of the conspiracy files shown last night.

What are your views regarding the 9/11 movement in the USA which includes Relatives of the disceased,firefighters,police and emergency services?

Posted by spiepie on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:58:31

come on david get your friends to vote for road traffic!

Posted by PJP40 on Monday, 19 February 2007 16:03:46

If 9/11 posts were being censored why are there so many damn posts about it?!

I for one hope they do start censoring conspiracy theory posts.

Posted by Svengali on Monday, 19 February 2007 16:15:09

Posted by spiepie on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:54:38

why do you not want to talk about this?


Because i'm utterly fed up with subject and its repeated posts to be honest.. it's just making this website a sounding board for 'The Truth' movement if i wanted to talk about this one subject reapteadly i would go and find a 911 website forum. I would kind of like to see other questions get answered RE The Economy, Education, Pensions, The Scottish Elections, UK Involvment in Europe, I would like to to see DC lay out some real proposals on how he plans to tackle the issues raised in the UNICEF report last week.. In the last 3-4 weeks there have been some really good questions that have just missed out the top 5, which is a shame.

If the moderators have any sense they would just ban all 911 related subjects for a while and let the other questions get answered.