The last four posts contain a lot of sense.
Amberlina
Quote:
But there you go. Perhaps a lifetime of having an extended family of smokers is what makes me so anti-smoking (and the fact that I suffer from asthma).
My wife is also an asthmatic, smoke causes her serious breathing problems for days after.
A celebration do at the local or some function hall was a serious risk for her.
So I agree with what you say.
We used to call the pub smoking room the "snug" and as Amberlina says the smoke permeated the rest of the building.
But as liz says
Quote:
In our area one of the latest planning applications;
A pub has applied for an outside 'gazebo style' building for smokers. I will not object.
Separate from the pub I see no harm in this and expect other areas could do the same.
This is a great idea, and will work. No staff, no connection with the bar, except maybe a hatch, and good ventilation. whats the problem.
Same in hospitals, have you seen the little groups of patients huddled outside the front door in all weathers, poor sad creatures! but they need their fix in decency.
Astro
Quote:
But then, I'm of the opinion that pubs aren't the place to take kids and maybe much of the social problems we are encountering now with the youth of today drinking under age, is because they are encouraged to join the world of adult recreation too early.
This is so true, there are places of adult entertainment (pubs are one) where kids should be banned.
(Incidentally I agree with women's or men's only clubs or whatever.)
But the last sentence is also important, we have got to get back to letting children grow up and develop naturally, it takes time and experience to deal with the world, it is our responsibility to protect kids till they get their wings!
Also - if I'm in the presence of children I modify my behaviour to suit. I don't expect to have to do that in a pub!