Quote:
The climate change action plan for County Durham is sponsored by Npower
Examples of good practice in reducing CO2 emissions cite GlaxoSmithKline GSK* and Teesdale Renewable Energy Challenge(TREC)
Comment: Unsupported and incorrect statements were given at the committee meeting which decided the planning application for the GSK wind turbines. (2002) The Chair requested that if personal interest was such that it would prejudice their decision significantly they should leave the room.,
Cllr Hughes,who wrote the foreward to the TREC brochure supporting GSK turbines and the Hamsterley Wind farm proposal, stayed and voted.
Chair for the 1st Ever Durham Dales Climate Change Event meeting,previous post, was Phil Hughes
Adrian Smith (TNEI) represented GSK, and
did not mention the Renewable Obligation Certificates, at that time worth £45 per MWh! One councillor voted in favour to spite his colleague! David Hand Principal Planning Officer gave misleading information regarding the height of the turbines in relation to the Angel of The North. I mentioned the fact to him but could not pursue it as he had by then been head hunted by John Prescott. (No connection intended or implied) Was the decision flawed? A spokesman for GSK confirmed that no on site wind speeds were taken
Quote:
For the reasons given I do not think GSK is an example of good practice for Co Durham climate change action plan nor is it an appropriate case study for PPS22CG
Comment TREC, the truth, is described in more detail
here pages 56-65. Details of some EU funded projects including TREC are in pages 84/85
I draw your attention to one point re the questionnaire mentioned on page 60. Many did not receive this so I contacted the Environment and Health Co-ordinator for Teesdale who checked and agreed many had not been sent. An administrative error? 48 households out of 14000 were said to be supportive of wind energy.She then moved to TNEI
Those figures do not justify building wind farms which will impact on the landscape.
What is really happening in the guise of climate change?