Your Blog

A pat on the back for Webcameron admin

Posted by Votedave on Monday, 19 February 2007 18:03:33

Hi, I would like to praise the admin on Webcameron for their good work on this website, not only for removing bad language but also now for showing the courage to remove these constant posts on 9/11 theories - as well having to take all this mindless criticism from certain bloggers today.

Why is it David Cameron's blog website in particular being targeted to the point of harrassment on this issue? Is it because he is the most interactive politician Britain has ever had, and the only senior politician to give all people the opportunity to debate all the issues under the sun on a website like this?

9/11 happened in 2001 in the United States of America and there's nothing any British Leader of the Opposition of 2005 onwards can do about it, of whatever political party. And what's more, we have debated this issue inside out and back to front already and David Cameron has answered at least two questions on the 9/11 report. If you don't like the answers, so be it. Move on and go to another blogsite.

Post edited by Votedave on Monday, 19 February 2007 18:05:54

You could comment if you logged in | Read comments


 

Posted by Tizzy on Monday, 19 February 2007 18:42:37

I don't understand why they don't wait until Wednesday to listen to the last question that got in to the Top 5. It's got silly and out of hand.

On the 'other' site I suggested they e-petition No 10. Though this has been done before there were less than 600 signatures. However, since the road charging petition, perhaps the exercise has caught the public imagination though they might get a tad less than 1.5 million.

 

Comment edited by Tizzy on Monday, 19 February 2007 19:27:45

Posted by kozmicstu on Monday, 19 February 2007 19:19:48

Thanks for this, Votedave. Seconded.

Posted by DaveGould on Monday, 19 February 2007 19:47:20

I support some kind of change in policy re: 9/11 posts but preferably one that's fair.

The main problem is not so much the number of posts and comments, but the voting.

Didn't there used to be some 'vote against' feature? I think that would help, but is still abusable (they'd vote against whichever question was ahead of theirs, no matter how much more relevant and important the question was).

Ultimately it might need a Slashdot-type karma system. There, you have to earn the right to vote through your own posts/comments being rated. The initial voters are hand-picked but from then on, 97% of moderation is done by users. It's a frankly genius system and the code is open source:
http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm600

Posted by WHYOHWHY on Monday, 19 February 2007 20:28:05

Should we censor people from debating 9/11, YES OR NO?

Posted by blackpikex on Monday, 19 February 2007 20:33:33

It might have happened all that time ago but the consequences of the actions that Bush and Blair have implemented as a response to 9/11 are here with us today. So say YES to the following.
ID cards, Satellite tracked cars, Police DNA databases and rfid chips in waste bins and god knows what else they will dream up before we have another election in 2009. It looks more and more likley that THE USA is going to invaid iran, will our troops follow them in and be backing them up? Why can you not see how one thing is leading into another and another. Do you realise that Police officers are being issued with Tazer Guns ? why when they already have pepper spray.

Posted by Votedave on Monday, 19 February 2007 20:38:37

Whyohwhy, the answer to your question is no. It's just we've debated it thoroughly already.

Posted by canvas on Monday, 19 February 2007 23:43:03

Well said votedave :)

Posted by ModernConservative on Monday, 19 February 2007 23:47:39

Well said Votedave - This needed to be stopped before it got out of hand - hopefully David will get the chance to answer some more diverse questions now.

Posted by Svengali on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 16:06:55

agreed

Posted by Geddes on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 17:18:17

Lovely. Agree, couldn't have put it in a better way!!! :)

Posted by MandolinKing on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 09:50:54

All "they" are asking for is a proper investigation of the events that day surrounding the death of British Citizens working in the World Trade Centre complex. A mere glance through the 9/11 Commission report show there ARE holes in the official account, in the same way there are holes in the 7/7 Narrative.

I think the easiest way to shut them up (for a while at least) would be for the release of full motion CCTV from:-

- Dept. of Transportation Cameras on the highway near the Pentagon.
- The Citgo Gas Station
- The Pentagon Building itself (It has to be one of the most watched buildings in the world, surely?)
- The nearby Sheraton Hotel

Full motion video from a range of different sites and angles showing the large Boeing jet hitting would allow them to analyse the content.

I think people often forget the British victims and families. It is pretty insulting to be told to "shut up" when you are trying to establish the true circumstances about a loved ones death.

That is something our government should have sorted out long ago for its citizens.

Posted by spivver on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 11:19:49

MandolinKing, the CCTV videos from the Citgo Gas Station and the nearby Sheraton Hotel have been released over the past few weeks, under the American Freedom of Information Act. They are available on the Internet, and I've seen them, albeit they are grainy.

Guess what folks, no large Boeing passenger aircraft is visible and hitting the Pentagon in either of them!!

So I know that many of you are sick and tired of our endless questions regarding 911, but BlackPikex has hit much of the nail on the head with his comment above. Read it. I see that many of you who are bellyaching about our endless 911 questions are the same ones also bellyaching about ID cards, DNA databases and the rest of the Orwellian state which has come about as a result of 911, including the fictitious "war on terror", illegal invasions of other countries, detention without trial, etc etc.

When Cameron has acknowledged that he has looked at all the evidence and anomolies surrounding 911 and the "official" explanation, when he has perhaps started to realise and understand the huge criminal lie which has been spun on us all, when he is starting to face his political responsibilities to the electorate, when he has started to acknowledge the predominance of the word TRUTH, then maybe the questions will ease up a little.

However, what would you all think if he were in Prime Minister's questions, firing questions at Blair, only then to shrug his shoulders at Blair's first "off the cuff" answer and reply with a "oh well, that's alright then".

Would you vote for someone like that, because I know for sure I wouldn't!!!

Posted by providor on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 14:00:26

Spivver - any chance of a link to those CCTV videos?

Posted by carlos on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 14:08:37

yeah spiv, I would really be interested in seeing them too, as I have made numerous posts that if those were released then it would prove that a boeing hi the pentagon - if they don't that is massive..

regarding the voting system - I think if you could give specific point score to each question from 0-10... then the (3/5) questions with the highest points get answerd - this would allow people to be more specific in their approval/disaproval....

Posted by spivver on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 14:48:27

The video from the Pentagon camera (assume it is in one of the car park areas) is on the BBC website at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4987716.stm

I think this was also shown during that BBC2 farce last Sunday as "proof" of the Boeing - 'scuse me for my derision :-))

The Hotel security video is at
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm

Let me know if you can see a Boeing please. Answers on a postcard to spivver...... please... anyone??....

Don't miss these