Posted by carlos on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 17:28:33

btw Cameron has answered the last set of Q's:

https://www.webcameron.org.uk/ask-david/response

Posted by Votedave on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 17:44:45

Good. Let's now move on.

Posted by scrubsupwell on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 19:51:33

A large amount of 9/11 data has been presented on webcameron I agree VoteDave, and as you say it's an American thing, so all praise must go to the researchers on this site for their tenacity and ferret like qualities of digging around in the public domain for information.

Kosmos keeps referring to the moderators 'may you swoop to action swiftly'; I find this statement totally without vision and against the hopes and aspirations of those that want a more 'open' society.

Moderation is a science and on this site has been it's success by sensible decisions. I have learnt a lot from these 911 posts and the opinions sit well with me..

Posted by canvas on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 19:53:48

yes - but now it's time to move on.... :)
I think the moderators have been fair.

Posted by scrubsupwell on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 20:04:50

I agree canvas, I'm stuck ;-) but maybe we really should now ask questions about 7/7 where even stranger 'anomolies' exist ? I hate fictional history, so does my history teacher, she is researching 'The Balfour agreement'. After all we would not want webcameron to be another episode of Coronation Street' would we?

Posted by canvas on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 20:07:45

Well scrubs - we can move on - and talk about the future. And also the PRESENT. :) LoL

Posted by carlos on Friday, 23 February 2007 12:50:30

thought i'd post this here too.. sorry if you seen it in the other thread:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3DRhwRN06I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sep-HDZoEBM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boNzLZInbjU
For anyone that is not 'allergic' to information, these 3 videos of an interview with Danny Jowenko - Danish Control Demolition expert, are fascinating - he gives very honest and frank answers: he runs the biggest CD company in the Netherlands, and is in no way a Conspiracy Theorist, but rather just answering question based on his EXPERTISE - i.e at first isn't screaming inside job - however if you watch all 3, he has some rather big doubts by the end.
Here is his company's website: http://www.jowenko.nl/

 

Comment edited by carlos on Friday, 23 February 2007 12:55:16

Posted by Stjimmy on Friday, 23 February 2007 16:06:33

Tizzy,

You keep reffering to people who have questions about 9/11 as "they" could you please explain what you mean by this comment?

Also what you meant by this?

OMG, I've been infected with 'there' lingua franca....

Infected by who?

Are you suggesting we are a virus that just because we question things like finding a passport on a manhattan sidewalk from the same plane they couldnt recover the black box from?

I come under your little group of "they", but as you seem to be so convinced that 9/11 happened the way it is laid out (the only way i can make sense of your attacking and trying to make fools of us) in the 9/11 report can you please answer the following?

Please explain how the passports of Mohammed Atta and Satam al-Sugam, both on Flight 11, survived the crash and fire to be found on the street near the World Trade Center.

•Who found the passports and what time where they found?
•Please describe the condition of each passport.
•Please explain how the passports of two hijackers survived the explosion of jet fuel.

Now I know you cant answer that, because the US Government hasnt. So Tizzy do you find that acceptable that the question remins unanswered, its a yes or no question. And if the answer is no then do you not think for even just one of the victims it should be answered? And if the answer is yes, what brings you to that conclusion?

Was NORAD aware of the four hijacked planes veering off course (like it is meant to) even before
being reported by the FAA? If not, please explain why NORAD which monitors
7000 flights a day, was unable to track the four aberrant flights?

And you also cannot answer that, yeah you guessed it because there isnt an answer to give. Strange this was as the Americans describe it "The Worst Terrorist Attack on US Soil" so wouldnt these be answered in an investigation?

I will leave it at those two questions, and I look forward to the response.

One more thing, all these people your branding "they" well it doesnt offend me I find it funny people seem to think we are so crazy to think that 9/11 has un-answered questions when it blatently does. However, I do find your comments disrespectful to the people who lost family and friends that day. Especially the Jersey Wives, my guess is you dont know who they are so incase im right....

They are the widows of a few of the 9/11 WTC victims, they after 9/11 had to travel nearly daily to Washington to FORCE Senators, Congree People even the White House to have the first 9/11 enquiry. Which to me doesnt really add up when they made such a big thing aobut it, which it was. Now for a nation that spent $100million on investigating Bill and Monica, do you not find this strange even more so when the figure for the 9/11 enquiry came to $2million.

Cheers :)

Posted by Svengali on Friday, 23 February 2007 16:19:51

"You keep reffering to people who have questions about 9/11 as "they" could you please explain what you mean by this comment?"

I think "they" are those on this website who seem to have there tin foil hats on a little to tight... would be my guess. :-)

Posted by Stjimmy on Friday, 23 February 2007 17:35:37

Nice Svengali!

Really a nice thing to do, inuslt the people who lost family that day. And we are the ones being targeted here for asking questions, when humans like that can walk around insulting people who have every right to ask questions to which their are no answers.

Well im glad im part of the "they" I would rather be one of the "they" than a heartless person who can't seem to grasp the basic facts.

Posted by Stjimmy on Friday, 23 February 2007 17:40:08

Oh and one more thing before I leave work,

I was as polite as I can manage in my comment, used all facts and not any theories.

And what I get back from some one who isn't one of the "they" is some silly little man who has nothing relevant to say.

Sorry done being polite!

 

Comment edited by Stjimmy on Friday, 23 February 2007 17:40:39

Posted by Svengali on Friday, 23 February 2007 17:41:55

Posted by Stjimmy on Friday, 23 February 2007 17:35:37
Nice Svengali!

Really a nice thing to do, inuslt the people who lost family that day. And we are the ones being targeted here for asking questions, when humans like that can walk around insulting people who have every right to ask questions to which their are no answers.

Well im glad im part of the "they" I would rather be one of the "they" than a heartless person who can't seem to grasp the basic facts.


*sigh* and again noting the caps this time :

I think "they" are those on THIS WEBISTE who seem to have there tin foil hats on a little to tight... would be my guess. :-)

it was no way an insult to anyone who died on the dayor any of there families..

 

Comment edited by Svengali on Friday, 23 February 2007 18:46:59

Posted by scrubsupwell on Friday, 23 February 2007 22:39:34

Thanks for those links carlos. I have realised that video uploads are censored on this site. Two of my videos have been truncated so they don't make much sense. I advise watching the pilots assocation film in its entirety. It's main message was that the so called Fight 77 black box data did not match the animation supplied by NTSB the government organisation. Emphasis was put on the light poles that were bought down by flight 77 when in fact the data supplied show that 'a plane' was too high to hit them. The final run into the Pentagon is also flawed, the flight path being different again in the two sets of data.

I am also unable to decypher the helicopter voice transmissions without the original key, although crucial infomation may be obtained from the recordings, the results I get are nonsense. So altogether a bad day where I seem to be going backwards.

Posted by canvas on Friday, 23 February 2007 22:43:48

Scrubs - you only seem to interact on 9/11 posts these days!? Come back into the 'other world' once in awhile and visit. Would be nice to hear your views on other subjects! Just like the good old days?! LoL :)

 

Comment edited by canvas on Friday, 23 February 2007 22:45:21

Posted by scrubsupwell on Saturday, 24 February 2007 00:13:42

Oh you softy canvas ;-) but your a good egg. Well I've been prodding Bush for a while now, so yes I am moving on. I have been thinking about something you said in a post back when, about 'if you had a child' made me feel a bit sad?