Your Blog

Bye Bye Arctic Monkeys, Blair's Ugly Rumours, Cliff, Beatles?....whistle a happy tune - and you're sued

Posted by Colleen on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 08:32:41

Billionaire music publishers and song writers who are feeling the pinch from the online revolution are taking action to shut down guitarists' self help and music transcription, or tab sharing, websites which are vital for young learners. The hugely rich and powerful music industry say these transcriptions infringe songwriters' copyrights.

We all want to protect songwriters reasonable copyrights. However, the problem lies with how damaging the over-censorious implications of such action - and its inevitable, heavy handed, extension into other areas - would be to young musicians and to UK's music industry. It could quite literally eventually mean that, whistle a happy tune in the wrong place - and you're sued.

Guitar notation (tab) books can be purchased, however these are an expensive con and offer an extremely limited range of music. For most young musicians, the prerequisite to obtaining a transcription of a required tune is often the purchase of a £20-30 book of 40 or so obscure tunes that you don't want, have never heard of and will never play. Many musicians, such as those in my family, were originally inspired to learn to play instruments by the desire to play one tune or a group of tunes by a favourite musician. Most of this music notation is not available without informal, persoanl transcription and sharing. Without the help of experienced fellow musicians who transcribe these tunes and who give technical tips, many might never learn to play or developed creatively.

Bear in mind that music and technical tip sharing - and crude amateur performance of such music - is how generations of musicians from the Arctic Monkeys to the Beatles, Cliff Richard and the Shadows, Stones, Tony Blair's band Ugly Rumours, and almost all amateur and professional rock musicians, learned to play - not at school. Yet most of the music which has inspired generations of young musicians to learn to play will not be available to them if this censorship trend is extended as we know it will be.

It's a more than a little ironic that Cliff Richard - and his guitar playing pal, holiday home sharing, pal, Tony Blair - should be behind a drive to apply draconian state censorship to the range of music available to young musicians, in order to give billionaire musicians like Cliff and his descendants an unreaonable 75 years of total control over their music.

young musiciand, UK music industry, songwriters copyright, Music industry

You could comment if you logged in | Read comments


 

Posted by canvas on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 20:03:55

The best solution is to ban all music by Cliff Richard!!! :)

You can never really own music - music is for everyone.

New internet sites which let you download music for free and collect the funds through advertisers totally makes sense. You will always be able to get any information you need on the internet anyway. It's not really very forward thinking of Tony Blair and the government to go down that route.

What should happen is websites should offer free music transcriptions, get funds from advertisers, then pay the musicians a royalty out of that money. The Musicians Union should support this theory. Then everyone is happy. Who knows maybe they are already planning this? I don't know.

Posted by kozmicstu on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:33:00

I don't think advertisement-fueled downloads make sense at all - What's with everybody wanting something for nothing these days? I'm much happier paying my 79p to get a song download that 'just works' than being irritated by pesky adverts every time I listen to my music. Regardless, SpiralFrog doesn't work with Macintosh OR iPod so there's no way I'm gonna be using it even if I wanted to

For the record, I pay for my email service too - £1 a month for my email, how's that.

Posted by canvas on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 23:17:07

Oh Kozmic - why do you always rain on my parade??!! lol

Posted by MikeThatIsAll on Friday, 19 January 2007 12:18:51

I wouldn't worry too much about the effect of this on British music. It shouldn't be forgotten that there is a world of difference between "the music industry" (huge conglomerates seeking to exploit artists) and the (often amateur) musicians themselves. If the billionaires want to shut down tab sites, then musicians will simply find another way of distributing the tabs. Likewise record companies. Lily Allen built up a huge following by herself, and huge numbers of musicians record and distribute their own music and advertise their concerts with no help at all from a record company. Much like water in a bucket - whenever you try and grasp it, it just escapes.

Don't miss these